and, as long as the players are happy with each other and receive the appropriate punishment (bans for a few games for manu) we shouldnt gripe too much.
There are 2 more worring issues that have come from this:
1) coaches behaviour – bringing our game into disrepute
2) inept officials – consistently bad decisions which incorrectly affect outcomes
as anyone seen glen Jackson (ex sarries) as a touch judge in super rugby? hasnt made a bad decision yet. we need younger ex rugger players who watch and understand the game
rant over
]]>Ashton’s reaction was completely understandable in my book. Probably shouldn’t have done it but Flood’s reaction to Hartley’s late tackle was far worse and nobody’s bothered about that. You appear to not be a big fan of Ashton but as you yourself say, the identity of the player involved should not be an issue.
And personally, I don’t think Tuilagi should be left out because of damage to team morale after what he did to Ashton. They should all be bigger than that. He should be left out until the coaches are convinced that he can handle the pressure of a big game without losing his rag at the slightest provocation. His non-selection would not be a punishment, it would be because he is too much of a risk. It has been suggested that Ashton must have said something offensive to him but given that Tuilagi gave him a hug at the end I think we can rule that out.
And just a final point on that. On Sky, they said Tuilagi showed great sportsmanship shaking Ashton by the hand. What a complete load of nonsense. The sportsmanship was by Ashton, not Tuilagi. Ashton would have been well within his rights to tell him to sod off. But fortunately rugby is better than that.
]]>Ashton’s reaction was completely understandable in my book. Probably shouldn’t have done it but Flood’s reaction to Hartley’s late tackle was far worse and nobody’s bothered about that. You appear to not be a big fan of Ashton but as you yourself say, the identity of the player involved should not be an issue.
And personally, I don’t think Tuilagi should be left out because of damage to team morale after what he did to Ashton. They should all be bigger than that. He should be left out until the coaches are convinced that he can handle the pressure of a big game without losing his rag at the slightest provocation. His non-selection would not be a punishment, it would be because he is too much of a risk. It has been suggested that Ashton must have said something offensive to him but given that Tuilagi gave him a hug at the end I think we can rule that out.
And just a final point on that. On Sky, they said Tuilagi showed great sportsmanship shaking Ashton by the hand. What a complete load of nonsense. The sportsmanship was by Ashton, not Tuilagi. Ashton would have been well within his rights to tell him to sod off. But fortunately rugby is better than that.
]]>I’m not saying it was the right thing to do. I am saying it was understandable. I’d quite like to punch Ashton 3 times in the face and I only watch the games. Manu should not be left out of the England squad because of it. He is young he’ll get more mature as he goes along. Draw a line under it and carry on. As far as I can see from the pictures Manu and Ashton have.
]]>For that reason, as a neutral, I hope Sarries win the final. But Manu to score, just so he ends the season on the right note, one he deserves after all his good play.
]]>For that reason, as a neutral, I hope Sarries win the final. But Manu to score, just so he ends the season on the right note, one he deserves after all his good play.
]]>