Ray
]]>My own preferred solution would be to expand the Aviva to 16 clubs to include two Scottish and two Welsh teams in a British league. Places could be ring fenced for Scotts/Welsh teams with promotion/relegation from Scots and Welsh club competitions which I assume must exist although I admit to almost complete ignorance in this area. PRL has now got very successful arrangements in place with the RFU re player release, the England qualified player scheme, player welfare and so on. This could be replicated with the WRU and SRU and probably to the benefit of all the national teams.
Of course this could never happen could it? too many ‘politics’ although, the Welsh bloggs have been so well balanced on this just maybe it’s possible. Now there are words i never thought to use in the same sentence in the context of rugby – ”Welsh and well balanced”
Cheers
]]>I’m not sure court will be needed – I doubt the English RFU would need to ban the comp. They would just revoke the union membership of any club who played in it. That might sound like semantics, as the end result is the same thing, but I think it’s more clear cut than trying to ban the actual creation of the other comp.
I’m still a little torn – the unions have, over the years, proven to be masters of ineptitude, things only changing when there is a virtual coup. However, the English PRL reps are hilariously arrogant tools who do not understand how to take what could be a self evidently good idea and get everyone on side with it. Press releases, selling foreign TV rights without a discussion, saying you’re the best there is, moaning about unfair rugby etc. are not the way to get anyone on side. We’re stuck between old farts in the unions and brash comically inept “businessmen” in the clubs. Messy.
If we could go back to the start I’d try and write the PRL “offer” for them as simply saying “we move to top 6 of each league as this gives a fair and equal split of money”. Bringing the whole resting players thing into it just a) gets peoples backs up b) sounds like whining for not winning it recently and c) doesn’t even matter as it’s not the key point.
]]>Given the completely different aims and views of the stakeholders it is logical to have two competitions one for the privately funded leagues and another for the Union funded leagues, probably with a play off between the top teams in each competition. Since the unions can’t force the English and French clubs to participate in a competition against their will how could they defend in court a ban on them forming their own competition? If the unions were to lose such a case it would fundamentaly weaken their position vis-a-vis clubs worldwide and I doubt they’ll risk it.
Regretably the Rugby demographics will make the RABO teams, especially the Irish, the commercial losers under almost any scenario.
]]>