I do wonder what sort of footwear they play with on this surface. Whilst making it quite clear that stamping is in no way condoned, could there be a sub-conscious process whereby the natural aversion is lessened.
It is not just that Wood has no history in this area, it is also the fact that it was so early in the game, and was clearly not an emotional reaction to any perceived or actual offence against him (as that can sometimes cause the “red mist”).
]]>Wood had no defence, he looked down, the ball was available, he stamped first on the body and the next blow was to the head. He had no reason to do it and an accident can be reasonably well ruled out and the only assumption a panel can come to is that it was deliberate. Dave Attwood got a 9 week ban (video below) for an aggreivated stamp when he could not see where his foot was going, so it could be argued that this is lenient.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3ZKDYuJgHaE
It would appear that the RFU have not accounted for mitigation in spite of his record and (presumably) guilty plea and obvious remorse. The full ruling is not available on the RFU yet and the articles have not indicated whether there was mitigation, but I wouldn’t be surprised if it were 12 weeks down to 8. The fact that he got a red card at the time and missed pretty much the entire game will also have counted. This would be much worse had he not been pinged in the game.
]]>