Categories
England France Ireland Italy Scotland Six Nations Slideshow Wales

Six Nations 2015 Round 2: 5 things we learned

Jamie Hosie picks out five of the main talking points from the weekend’s Six Nations games, including some alarming disciplinary problems

scotland

1. Disciplinary issues

There were two airborne tackles that caused furore in the Scotland vs Wales game, the first involving Finn Russell and the second involving Jonathan Davies. There are a myriad of issues surrounding the two incidents, including intent, consistency of application of the law and the duty of care of the tackling player. Law 10.4 (i) states “A player must not tackle nor tap, push or pull the foot or feet of an opponent jumping for the ball in a lineout or in open play” which leaves quite a lot up to the interpretation of the referee. Unless I’ve missed something, nowhere do the laws go into detail about duty of care, or intent, or where the line is between yellow and red card offences – certainly, Finn Russell’s looked worse than that of Jonathan Davies, and was alarmingly similar to Jared Payne’s offence a couple of years ago, which sparked this whole debate. Where is the consistency? Referees need to be educated better than just making their best guess. Intriguingly, just above the aforementioned ruling, Law 10.4 (h) states “A player must not charge into a ruck or maul. Charging includes any contact made without use of the arms, or without grasping a player.” The below Vine of one such an incident has been doing the rounds since the weekend – is it going to take a serious injury for this to be policed properly?

2. Are you not entertained?

The England management could have been forgiven for channelling a bit of Maximus Decimus Meridius in the aftermath of their win over Italy. Six tries and 47 points later, many fans seemed still disgruntled. Sure, there were some disappointing missed tackles but the crux of the matter is, England have added +30 to their points difference and scored six tries, three of which included no little skill, two of which were well worked forwards moves and one of which was a stroke of masterful opportunism. Anyone moaning about the way England played would do well to cast their minds back two years to when the side had to rely on six Toby Flood penalties to scratch their way to an 18-11 win. That was the year they were also slaughtered by Wales in Cardiff, so to have come through what were 2013’s two biggest disappointments so well is hugely impressive. There are things to work on, but it sets England up well for the rest of the Championship.

3. Less than the sum of their parts

How can a team that is packed full of as much individual talent as France fail to conjure more than one try from the opening two rounds? Any side that can point to Camille Lopez, Damien Chouly, Wesley Fofana, Teddy Thomas and Yoann Huget should be scoring for fun, regardless of who is defending. And yet they seem devoid of ideas, unsure of their identity as a team and unsure of what the right style of play for them is. Their only try this championship came at the weekend and to be fair to them, it was a beauty. But it was borne of relaxing the structure they had employed, and almost harking back to the more laissez-faire attitude for which they used to be known. Perhaps the shackles need to be slackened – every side needs to play within some sort of structure but the old cliché of ‘Gallic flair’ is slipping further and further from the truth. And with the quality of players they have, it really shouldn’t be.

4. Same old Scotland

Well, that’s not actually true. There is a brave new Scotland team threatening to emerge, a side that possesses a set of backs capable of mixing it with the best and coming out on top. The like of Stuart Hogg and Mark Bennett have the potential to be mentioned in the future in the same breath as the finest attacking talent in the world, and while Finn Russell had a thoroughly mixed game against Wales he must be given the chance to prosper as he is comfortably the most rounded player Scotland have had in that shirt for quite some time. And yet they are still dogged by the same issues that have hampered them in years gone by. Most glaringly, they have an unfailing ability to shoot themselves in the foot when the chance to score, or win the game, presents itself. Countless times they butchered try-scoring chances, and Jim Hamilton’s moronic decision to pick a fight with the clock rapidly approaching the red zone, thus denying Scotland time to receive the restart, was so typical of a side that has worked harder than any down the years to throw away winning positions. It is so frustrating for the fans.

5. All eyes on Dublin

England’s visit to Dublin in round three was always going to be one of the biggest games of the tournament, but now it looks especially gargantuan. Both sides are unbeaten, and if England have played the better rugby in the tournament so far then Ireland’s home advantage will negate that. Picking a winner is going to be desperately difficult, but the ace in hole could well prove to be Ireland’s savvy Kiwi Joe Schmidt. He has transformed this Ireland side into one that is ruthlessly pragmatic, and can pick apart a side’s weaknesses while negating their strengths. It is why you can bet Ireland will have a way of stopping Jonathan Joseph – the chances of him being anywhere near as influential for a third game in a row seem slim. Ireland are struggling to score tries, though, but when you’re winning that hardly matters. Turn over England at the Aviva Stadium, and it’s tough to see them not winning the title.

By Jamie Hosie
Follow Jamie on Twitter: @jhosie43

Photo by: Patrick Khachfe / Onside Images

26 replies on “Six Nations 2015 Round 2: 5 things we learned”

The kiwi referee Jackson has been promoted to international
Far too quickly. He is no where good enough! Having said that he did not cost Scotland the game. To slow to breakdown and to be honest,many times like headless chickens in attack!They were a huge disappointment to their tens of thousands of fans!

Regarding the “clear out” by Jenkins. This should be penalised. It is dangerous, and it happens far to often without sanction in the game today.

However – Hogg is clearly not attempting to steal the ball, primarily because he has moved ahead of the ball, and his hands are busy supporting his weight. This again happens all to regularly. he has chosen to “slow” the Welsh ball instead of actually challenging for it.

So Hogg takes this position to make is harder for him to be cleared out, and to make it harder for the Welsh player to present the ball cleanly, hoping for a penalty for holding on.

It is a technical penalty to Wales. Subsequently reversed with Jenkins dangerous shoulder charge. If I were the ref, anyway.

I’d say that the welsh player is utilising the “squeeze ball” tactic as he’s placing the ball under his body through his legs to protect it from being stolen by opposition defenders, which I remember being illegal in the first place. So the technical infringement is the ball carrier’s.

The supporting of their weight is rarely policed, and really gets me more than any other infringement. All to often the officials side with the defenders, when they should be penalising them.

Yes, and I believe that it is this body position that “encourages” the type of “clean out” that we see from Jenkins

billyburgess
Why specifically? Yr comment is too general.

I personally though he should have pinged Wales more than a few for kicking the ball away AFTER the whistle, lying & NOT rolling from the ruck & refusing to give the ball up IMMED afer penalties.

All good points above about the clear out, the slowing of the ball and the squeeze ball

This habit of charging into the ruck seems to be particularly prevalent in the southern hemisphere and becoming more so up here. It needs to be stamped out as it will cause a serious injury.

As for Russell’s card being similar to Hogg’s last year. Eh? Hogg was sent off last year for quite a vicious late shoulder charge into Biggar’s jaw ages after Biggar had kicked the ball away. There was no high ball and no one was challenging for anything. The two incidences couldn’t have been more different

The reason Finn’s looked worse is that he turned away so that his shoulders hit Biggar’s legs. But to me it looked like he did as the only other option was to get Biggar’s knee in his face – it may even have just been an automatic reaction

The whole area needs sorting out though and short of banning jumping for high balls, I don’t know how you could do it.

The yellow card for JD was rubbish, just because he was following the ball he got carded?? he was also off the ground, they both got there the same time and hit each other. The scots 10 deserved his. (by the way i am English so watched it as a neutral)

The clearing out issue has to be policed, one day someone is going to get very hurt, they must use their arms to clear out, any body/shoulder charge should be binned….simple

The same goes for “feeding” in the scrum, the scrum now at first class level is a joke…..what is the point of hookers any more, they complain it’s because of the pressure, well if they can’t hack it then go and play football……the refs also blow up too soon when a team is going backwards fast….let play continue we are getting fed up watching scrums reform for another penalty….might as well play league and give them up altogether

The Scots played brilliantly in defence and are now difficult to score against. I hope JJ can unlock them when the English play them.

Russell is not an international 10, and got caught out several times on Sunday, by the time he plays against England and the other top teams they will murder him

Wales must keep Phillips on the bench….he offers nothing anymore for Wales, too slow at passing from the back of the scrum/maul/ruck…..if he is to continue playing….then stop taking those mincing little steps before the pass….someone somewhere in Wales must be watching him?

Disagree. Russell is an international 10 and will grow into a very good international 10. He had a great autumn series and lets not forget he’s 22 years old and not even played a year of professional rugby!

Ian, absolutely right. Russell has bags of talent.

He made a few cock-ups on Sunday, BUT Scotland should look to iron these out rather than jettison him.

Much rather him than Weir, or Heathcote. Who else do they have?

Unfortunately, the depth behind him is pretty non existent.

Weir, who would’ve been next in line, is ruled out for the entire six nations.
I’ve never been convinced by Heathcote. Tonks was covering 10 from the bench against Wales while Horne was there against France.

Personally, I’d give Peter Horne a go against Italy, good player and put in a man of the match performance for Glasgow last weekend.

After to agree with James on the scrum issues. All teams, North and southern hemerspheres, are looking for the scrum as a way of enticing a penalty rather than an a platform form which to launch offensive/defensive plays. Simple change in laws to counter act this would be along the lines of, when the scrum becomes stationary for whatever reason, at the 8’s feet the ball is playable!

I think that a lot of refs are now insisting that the ball is played. It is good to see.

On thing that does irritate a little is the amount of penalty tries that are awarded at scrums, when – it appears to me – that the try would have been scored anyway. It must irritate a few of the No8’s as well?

I hate to say this but maybe keeping JJ on the wing for the Ireland game might be a good move.

It may help to lessen Ireland’s ability to keep him out of the game. I know it means another centre partnership but needs must some times. having said that,if he wants to become a truly great centre then he has to impose himself on any game,regardless of the opposition tactics.

Forget every thing I just suggested!

Pablito
Perhaps if rucking is brought back, it will stamp out charging?

Finn was dealt with, agree or not. Can’t hit a man in the air. Intent is no excuse apparently. Seems that 1st to the ball has right of way & 2nd is a yellow if he impedes or collides in any way with the former. Begs the ? of what now constitutes competing for the ball tho. Maybe TMO replays of EVERY high ball?

Scotland are a bit green & won’t haven’t time to bed in properly for the WC let alone the 6N. Look @ England. Taken Lancs over 3 yrs & injuries to bed his team in… so far. Anyway, Finn ought to be horse whipped for missing touch… TWICE! If someone can’t play basic rugger, what’s he doing there?! Whiff of hair dryer = collapse? Also, I don’t know about NUMEROUS butchered chances, but there was 1 in particular on the rh side earlyish, in/near the oppo 22, when the inside back stuck his hand out & knocked it on with his outside wide man set to score unimpeded. If a guy can’t catch it, LEAVE it! Basic, er, rugger. Need to eradicate errors & take ALL their chances to compete. Too little, too late. Pity for them that they’re not playing England @ home tho. Been more interesting for me. As it is, can’t see a win except potentially v Italy.

Don P I agree that Finn must take some stick for missing touch. That said it is worth rememberng that he has only been playing professional rugby for about a year. Feeling the pressure does not seem unreasonable so early in his career. Clearly some development still to do. BUT, compared to the recent 10s Scotland have had he is a class above already.

James
The IRB (WR) are like FIFA. Usless. They WON’T insist that refs simply apply the rules. Refs, IMO, are massaging their ‘careers’ (e.g.,WC finals?) & trying to ‘look’ the part instead of doing their jobs. Human nature I’m afraid. Over to the IRB tho.

Agree regds Ireland – mostly. And they’ve lost Heaslip. Schmidt has surprised me somewhat in that he’s played more ‘English’, esp when he has won a few cups with Claremont & Leinster & his style then, especially with the latter, was an all court game with their backs as smooth as silk.

Mike
Perhaps you’re right regds Russell. It just that it worries me when someone, exp or not @ Int’al level, miss cues fundamentally in the same basic action as for a club game. And twice!? Needs more trick cyclist time maybe? Reminded me of 12trees’ butchered try for Glous recently, when all he had to do was draw & pass to his outside man. Basic, orthodox stuff. Are these 1 off errors, or a character flaw? Time will tell, in Russell’s case anyway, I guess.

Comments are closed.