Equalled or beaten at scrum time by Scotlands 4th (or 5th?) choice loose head. Failed to pull his weight in the ruck, maul or the tackle. And despite all this he didn’t even touch the ball once!
Why is he there? Can anyone imagine NZ’s props not touching the ball once? they seem to manage carrying the ball, whilst also doing well in the scrum, ruck, maul and tackle.
This is just making excuses for Cole now. When was the last time he dominated another front row at international level?
He’s been a great servant for England but it’s time to start fading him out. Start him by all means as we don’t have anyone else with his experience. But let’s have him off at half time and let’s get someone else get some experience. Sinckler would be my choice, but i don’t mind Williams
]]>As a Leicester fan I have been a huge advocate of Dan Cole for years, and while he has never been the most formidable carrier I remember when we used to comment that having Cole was like having another back row player on the pitch due to his impact. As an international prop in the supposed second best side in the world, I don’t think it is unreasonable to say he needs to do more than be ‘solid’ in the scrum.
]]>I wonder if we ought to give the coaches a mark. It would undoubtedly be EJ’s lowest of his tenure. I would suggest a 3 possibly. Can’t understand how he/England managed to completely nullify the Scottish breakdown work at Twickenham 12 months ago with total power rucking and then so completely fail at Murrayfield with total powderpuff rucking.
]]>I think this point may have been raised before and I this suggestion isn’t a long term solution but with the injuries to Big Billy, Nathan Hughes (yes I know he’s back) and Sam Simmonds my thought would’ve been to pick a player for the interim that fits the Billy/Hughes model in other words Thomas Waldrom.
Yes I know the years are unwinding on Thomas the Tank Engine but he is still an effective ball carrier at Number 8 for Exeter and still destructive from 5 yards out, I personally wouldn’t of minded him coming on when Hughes ran out of gas, as I say not a long term solution (like Wigglesworth) but someone who could plug a gap in an effective England tactic rather than try and make do with Robshaw or even Haskell.
]]>I am a huge fan of Underhill and I think he should be excused for his “over-exuberance” in that tackle. Overall he made an incredible impact when he came on. Easily England’s best option for openside. Robshaw’s best position is clearly blindside, and with Underhill available there’s no reason to play Robshaw at 7.
England’s back row was humiliated by Scotland, but I really think this is easily corrected, especially if Simmonds is fit for France. Here’s a back row selection that has blokes playing in their best positions (in my opinion) and combines youth and experience:
6. Robshaw
7. Underhill
8. Simmonds
And I would honestly have Hask on the bench to cover all three. He has the experience to come on and help close a game out, and has a point to prove.
]]>