Comments on: Super Rugby 2016: Round 17 Predictions https://therugbyblog.com/super-rugby-2016-round-17-predictions Rugby Union opinion and discussion, for the fans, by the fans. Sat, 22 Jul 2017 18:32:44 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=4.7.5 By: Michele https://therugbyblog.com/super-rugby-2016-round-17-predictions#comment-389012 Thu, 21 Jul 2016 09:24:32 +0000 https://therugbyblog.com/?p=42009#comment-389012 What are your predictions for this weekend?

]]>
By: Don P https://therugbyblog.com/super-rugby-2016-round-17-predictions#comment-388996 Sun, 17 Jul 2016 14:35:28 +0000 https://therugbyblog.com/?p=42009#comment-388996 Mmmm. Mighty trick things these predictions.

Deemed the Blues @ home ought to have scraped it, but thought it could have gone either way for much of the time whilst viewing the game.

And conversely with the Hurricanes, couldn’t see them turning Canterbury over away. Ending up atop the Kiwi conference, who’d have guessed that 1? Not me.

Also, I thought the Chiefs would be just too clinical v the Highlanders. The yellow probably made a difference, but those Otago boys looked plenty tenacious & resilient to me.. although Waikato aren’t out of it yet.

]]>
By: Michael https://therugbyblog.com/super-rugby-2016-round-17-predictions#comment-388993 Sat, 16 Jul 2016 12:54:14 +0000 https://therugbyblog.com/?p=42009#comment-388993 Oh well, Jamie, 2 right out of the first 6 is bad but it could have been worse. Just.

]]>
By: Robbo https://therugbyblog.com/super-rugby-2016-round-17-predictions#comment-388990 Fri, 15 Jul 2016 15:20:45 +0000 https://therugbyblog.com/?p=42009#comment-388990 Eddie Jones should keep one eye on Piers Francis at the blues

]]>
By: Marcus https://therugbyblog.com/super-rugby-2016-round-17-predictions#comment-388986 Thu, 14 Jul 2016 07:36:23 +0000 https://therugbyblog.com/?p=42009#comment-388986 After the way the blues played against the brumbies it is hard to see them loosing against the tah’s

]]>
By: Richard https://therugbyblog.com/super-rugby-2016-round-17-predictions#comment-388985 Thu, 14 Jul 2016 05:47:10 +0000 https://therugbyblog.com/?p=42009#comment-388985 Yeah the smart thing about Ackers move is that the players r just trying to prove themselves so the added pressure isn’t as much if a factor

]]>
By: pedanticpete https://therugbyblog.com/super-rugby-2016-round-17-predictions#comment-388982 Wed, 13 Jul 2016 13:36:13 +0000 https://therugbyblog.com/?p=42009#comment-388982 Lions should have rested half against Argies and the other half against Sharks and still win both

]]>
By: Stef Potgieter https://therugbyblog.com/super-rugby-2016-round-17-predictions#comment-388981 Wed, 13 Jul 2016 12:24:52 +0000 https://therugbyblog.com/?p=42009#comment-388981 Lions will do it Lions 4 Life

]]>
By: Joan Boot https://therugbyblog.com/super-rugby-2016-round-17-predictions#comment-388980 Wed, 13 Jul 2016 10:00:14 +0000 https://therugbyblog.com/?p=42009#comment-388980 The Lions have made the best choice under the circumstances. They play on Saturday and because it is a 26 hour trip will only return late Monday or early Tuesday.The Sharks play at home on Friday and will be well rested, resulting in an unfair contest if the Lions were still the log leaders.

]]>
By: Henwill Kuit https://therugbyblog.com/super-rugby-2016-round-17-predictions#comment-388979 Wed, 13 Jul 2016 09:57:36 +0000 https://therugbyblog.com/?p=42009#comment-388979 Ackermann knows what he’s doing,stil a strong Lions team watch them,the union is in a strong place!Lions4Life!Think the blues will beat the tahs and the landers the chiefs,going for my 3rd Gsp in a row let’s hope!

]]>
By: Belinda Glenn https://therugbyblog.com/super-rugby-2016-round-17-predictions#comment-388978 Wed, 13 Jul 2016 09:13:21 +0000 https://therugbyblog.com/?p=42009#comment-388978 Hehehe…only because the Sharks are my team and I’m secretly hoping they’ll stage a major upset ????

]]>
By: Jamie https://therugbyblog.com/super-rugby-2016-round-17-predictions#comment-388977 Wed, 13 Jul 2016 08:47:42 +0000 https://therugbyblog.com/?p=42009#comment-388977 Ha well spotted, just checking you were all awake :)

]]>